WHAT IS VIOLENCE AGAINST HUMANITY: A SUGGESTION

The representatives of every species have a natural way to act. So have human beings too, a woman or a man, and vice versa.

For instance, for birds flying is a natural habit. For fish it is natural to swim in the seas, rivers and lakes. For humans thinking is natural and practical habit to survive in the nature - and big cities.


If birds' wings are cut off, their natural function is prevented. If a human being is not allowed to report what he or she sees, his or her natural instinct of being in the world has been destroyed. What one sees may be an illusion and what masters tell him to see is an illusion -->                  Seeing is possible a being in illusion.

Peace doesn't mean silence inside of mouths and lack of contradictions in human relationship. Peace in society doesn't collapse when people criticizes a leading bloc and claims our real life is not what authorities, news and movies tell us and when people disagree with and rebel. In brief, to prevent one's thinking by force is violence, not peace.
"Freedom" of speech occurs  in China

and

"Freedom" of speech doesn't occur in China

So, what do you think about ideologies?
 
But is to protect one's thinking peaceful then? Let's think it together, dear friend:

1. If one must protect peace, it is not violence (Protection: why not a violent act? I don't know... this seems to be a weak premise.)
2. If two parties or persons have a quarrel, peace disappears (from experience)
3. If peace disappears, one must protect peace (Peace is better than war; self-evident)
4. They start to fight
5. Peace disappears (from 2 and 4)
6. One must protect peace (from 3 and 5)

     7. So, the protection of peace is not violence (from 1 and 6). 

But the protection of peace by violence is violence (the logic of despotism).